vision stuff
Wednesday, January 31st, 2007 by Heidithis is emy’s firsr post, sh’es eating my hands while i type.
WQe saw trhe vision person (this isn’t working, putting teething monster down to scoot.)
We met with the children’s caseworker from the Blind Children’s Vocational & Discovery Development Program. Now I know what they do and how they work with his vision teacher, two different programs. Anyway, he qualifies for this newest program only because he’s getting vision services. He’s getting vision services because of his eye exam, which says he has ROP and a strong prescription. The fact that his vision is corrected to the higher end of “normal” is apparently irrelevant. Which is fine by me!
He’s not blind, the caseworker said his vision is so great there is no way he’ll be considered disabled by the government - HOORAY!!
The caseworker did ask why Bennett is receiving services since his acuity is great and I honestly have no idea, but I’m not going to complain. She’s adding to our mix:
1. school advocacy, she’ll attend his ARD meeting once he turns 3 and moves to the school for services.
2. diagnosis information
3. social support - they host activities for blind & low vision kids in the metroplex
4. vocational and occupational training (once he’s 3)
5. equipment purchases for anything his vision program doesn’t pay for, but only for leisure stuff - nothing educational, his vision services are suppose to cover that.
She thought a specialized table thing for him would be good, it slants so he can get a better view of coloring, books, etc. She has to get an official refusal to purchase through his other agency and then she buys it but it’s this weird mix up because ECI won’t buy it, but I suspect his vision program would but this caseworker says she’s not going to ask the vision people because ECI is “suppose” to buy it so she’ll ask them, they’ll refuse, then she’ll buy it. HUH?? Without even asking the vision teacher? I don’t get it.
She warned us that Bennett will probably be cut off by the school district once he turns 6 (mandatory age for enrollment in Texas) and they will no longer provide vision services or purchase equipment. Not a big deal, unless he is needing braille. She said if he’s a braille reader we need to seriously reconsider homeschooling because we won’t be able to afford the equipment the school could buy, or pay for the therapy.
That’s a whole other discussion. Needless to say I did some serious research last night and read through some of the Texas Education Agency legal code last night (it’s HUGE! and mostly really BORING!!) and I believe we found our loophole so that we can homeschool and still get state and federal funding to pay equipment and vision services. Hooray! I’m going to bring it up to the special education director later this week, we’ve been working with her about Moira so she knows Bennett is heading their direction.
I should say, our school district has been AMAZING and gone out of their way to ensure Moira gets all sorts of help above and beyond anything we expected. We didn’t have to fight to get any services, we’ve been declining services. So we’re optimistic that later this year when Bennett moves to them that they will be just as helpful. I just want to make sure they don’t try to drop Bennett (or Mo, if she still needs services) when they turn 6 years old and are homeschooling instead of enrolling. I know in part it’s a funding issue but that’s where my loophole comes in - I think we found a way for them to get funding, us to get services/equipment, and for the kids to not have to attend the school to get the help.
And if the school hesitates at all, then I’ll bring up the loophole and if they hesitate on that, we learned there are parent advocates to help smooth the process and the caseworker will come. And his ECI people. I told his OT today, if we bring enough people in they may just start giving us what we want because it’s easier than fighting us. But again, we’re happy with our school district. They’re great.









