We don’t use a set curriculum, we are picking and choosing what we love and we’re influenced by a lot of different educational theories. So here are some highlights:
As of November 2007 –
We like a lot of Charlotte Mason and you can learn more about her here. There’s a lot of overlap with classical education (“live” books, chronology of history and literature to accompany, narration/copy work, great books, foreign language, etc.) A difference is Charlotte Mason has a HUGE focus on outside time and no formal lessons for kids before 6 years of age – and we really like both of those points. We still let Mo sit down and do lessons with C if she asks, but they are not required. I also like the emphasis on outside time/exercise for child development and as we’re learning more about Mo’s situation, that gross motor time is crucial for the ability to later develop fine motor skills to do the table work. I also like her focus on short lessons and habit training, teaching kids to focus and have a good attention span for the short time (15 minutes or so at our stage) but not expecting focus for long lessons when it’s not age appropriate. And I like keeping the mornings for lessons while the kids are “fresh” and keeping afternoons free for play and being kids. Oh, and the handiwork – teaching kids hands on skills. I like that.
For actual curriculum/book choices I really like The Well Trained Mind for their book lists and day to day implementation. We are using their books for language and history/geography. We’re doing Saxon for math. Unlike WTM we are NOT starting the kids formally early. We’re not starting foreign languages young. We are rotating science topics (CM suggests staying with nature/life science for the first many years and WTM has you rotate biology, earth, chemistry, physics – we’ve decided to go with the rotation.)
So for these early years, we’re doing classical method with a Charlotte Mason influence. We plan to have this as a guideline for the next 7 years or so at which point we’ll be in the last phase of the classical method and Christopher will be setting his own academic goals (with our input, of course.) The goal is to get the foundation set in the first four years (grammar stage) and then gradually pass more autonomy to them in the next four years (rhetoric stage) and the last four years they should be much more on their own (logic stage)… They can look at apprenticeships or jobs, explore occupational interests, take college courses, etc.
I like this approach because it appeals to the logic side of my brain – the setting of a foundation, then framework. I like the chronological approach, I like the systemic way of exploring literature from the time period of history you are studying. I like the outside time, I absolutely agree now that children should NOT be doing formal learning (table work, sitting down to do math or language or whatever) before age six. Of course we seize informal learning chances, and Moira loves the enrichment activities, but we do not require her to sit down and do lessons the way we have Christopher do his Saxon math (about 15 minutes) or First Language Lessons (maybe 10 minutes and another 10 minutes for writing) each day. And in these early years we are focusing on language, math, and outside time. The history is purely a bonus, the music/piano is fun but not mandatory, science can be just nature observation at this point, etc. We feel a solid groundwork in languages and mathematics is the most crucial items he needs to be ready for more down the line.
And this only took five years of discussion and research and exploring with Kit for us to find what seems to work well for our family – well, for Christopher. (Only five years, you heard my sarcasm there, right?) I believe this approach will be beneficial for ALL the kids but we may find Moira thrives on something else, so we’re open to learning about new theories we run across. I like to know all my options, and I only started studying Charlotte Mason this year when a friend mentioned it and I’m SO glad we did – it’s changed the way we live on a day to day basis.
So, reminder to self to be open to learning new things…
As of May 2010 –
Yes to all of the above, still loving the Charlotte Mason and the Well Trained Mind but we pick and choose from both. As the kids get older we plan to implement more of the suggestions from A Thomas Jefferson Education but that really doesn’t kick in until around 12 years of age. In the meantime I’m liking the literature & socratic method approach laid out in Teaching the Classics. Read my post about that here. We’ve also added Spell to Write & Read to our language line up.
Posts I wrote on Charlotte Mason.
Posts I wrote on A Thomas Jefferson Education.
Posts I wrote on the classical approach and A Well Trained Mind.
Check out the categories links to the left for more of my ramblings. All of those posts are in reverse chronological order to further confuse you, sorry.